Community Advisory Board

Non-scientist volunteers who advocate for the Cancer Center, providing an essential link with local, national and global communities. 
Community Advisory Board

Mission

Advocate for the Cancer Center by engaging local, state, national and global communities in support of cancer research.

Key objectives

  • Host annual open houses for the community
  • Participate as advocates in faculty grants
  • Expand and ensure participation and visibility in regional cancer-related events
  • Serve as consumer reviewers/advocates for various federal and state granting agencies
  • Welcome and support new graduate students and postdoctoral scholars
  • Be a national resource for advocacy training

Focus

Alignment with Cancer Center strategies

Research

  • Grant writing support
  • Support Cancer Center graduate student and postdoctoral programs
  • Community advocacy for research cancer funding
  • Train and support graduate students and postdocs in presenting their research to the public

Patient

  • Patient line of sight
  • Community outreach and alliances
  • Impact bench to bedside
  • Promoting a partnership between patients and science

Cancer Center engagement

  • Membership on institutional committees
  • Sanford Burnham Prebys presence at local cancer awareness events
  • Support student scholarships (e.g., Fishman Fund)

Advocacy

Supporting basic translational cancer research

Identify and communicate the needs and benefits of research with a focus on patient impact

Develop a network of cancer center advocates. Focus is on: research, patient care delivery, collaboration, education, mutual support

Building brand awareness, educating, and creating dialogue among Researchers and Community

Community = San Diego (Open Houses), California, National, Global

Educate = interpret, frame, translate disseminate research study findings

Elevating understanding and providing the patient perspective in the Cancer Center

Communicating the patient voice to research needs, benefits, and grant proposals

  • Letters of Support, Letters of Commitment, Grant Writing Assistance

Participate as patient advocate and grant reviewers at national, state and local level (e.g., DOD, NIH, NCI, FDA, CBCRP, and Padres Pedal the Cause™)

 


 

Advocate for the scientific faculty by engaging local, national, and global communities at our NCI-Designated Cancer Center at Sanford Burnham Prebys.

We do this by:

  • Supporting the work of translating basic cancer research
  • Building brand awareness, educating, and creating dialogue among Researchers and Community 
  • Elevating awareness and providing the patient perspective in the Cancer Center
  • Communicating the patient voice to research needs, benefits, and grant proposals
  • Identifying and supporting additional funding opportunities

Open Houses

Learn about our Cancer Center Open Houses—co-hosted by the Community Advisory Board and our scientists—for cancer survivors, their families and friends and research advocates.

Cancer and Coronavirus: The threat of COVID-19 to Cancer Mortality

Chanda Lab, Snyder Lab, Bradley Lab

Topics: Repurposed drugs for treating COVID-19; Mini lungs for testing COVID-19 drugs; COVID-19 and the immune system

Learn More

Science, Business and Advocacy in the Pursuit of New Cancer Therapies

Powis Lab, Chanda Lab, Cosford Lab, CAB

Topics: The San Diego Biocluster: A model for new cancer drug discovery; Screening and chemistry in cancer drug discovery; Biologics: A new type of cancer therapy; The patient’s voice in advancing cancer treatment

Learn More

The Science Behind: Advancement in Cancer Treatment

Emerling Lab, Bradley Lab, Commisso Lab, Peterson Lab

Topics: Eric Dudl Scholarship presentation; Breast cancer – How cells communicate; Pancreatic cancer – Feeding itself; Immunotherapy of cancer – How T-Cells reenergize; Microbiome and cancer – How bugs control response to therapy

Learn More

Seeing is Believing: Cancer Imaging

Marassi Lab, Liddington Lab, Hanein Lab, Powis Lab

Topics: Picture This: MRI Imaging; Eye on Crystals: Crystallography; Getting Big to See Small: Cryo-Electron Microscopy; In Focus: Optical Imaging of Cancer Cells

Learn More

The Science Behind: Personalizing Cancer Medicine

Wechsler-Reya Lab, Adams Lab, Vuori Lab, CLS Shared Resource

Topics: Personalized cancer care for children with brain tumors; Decoding your tumor's response at the single cell level; Testing new cancer drugs using patient samples; Robots speed progress in finding cancer cures

Learn More

The Science Behind: Cancer and Aging

Adams Lab, Ocorr Lab, Hansen Lab, Peterson Lab

Topics: Diet and Exercice and Aging; The Aging Heart; Cellular Aging; The Microbiome and Aging

Learn More

October 2016

The Science Behind: Environment, Lifestyle and Cancer

Powis Lab, Ware Lab, Peterson Lab, Ocorr Lab, CLS Shared Resource – Ian Pass and Chris Larson

June 2016

Gene Editing and Gene Therapy for Cancer

Rickert Lab, Petroski Lab, Snyder Lab, Functional Genomics Shared Resource – Dr. Pedro Aza-Blanc

October 2015

New Technologies Behind Cancer Research Discovery

Ruoslahti Lab, Hanein Lab, Genomics Shared Resource – Dr. Brian James

June 2015

The Science Behind Immunotherapy – Directing your Immune System to Attack Cancer

Rickert Lab, Ware Lab, Bradley Lab

Asset 1
Community Advisory Board Members

Spotlight

Sisters

Helen Eckmann and Ruth Claire Black share a common history with breast cancer and a drive to serve their community.

Ruth Claire Black and Helen Eckmann are sisters from different parents. They both have doctorates, work as professors and volunteer for Sanford Burnham Prebys’ Cancer Advisory Board (CAB).

Black and Eckman are incurable optimists and are both thriving after breast cancer. They want other cancer survivors to feel the same way.

“One of the messages we like to deliver is that you can live an amazing, vibrant, positive, productive, fully engaged-in-your-community life,” says Black, “even after fully metastasized, stage 4 breast cancer.”

Parallel journeys

Black knew all along that she was going to face breast cancer. Both her grandmother and mother died from the disease when they were in their 50s. That shoe dropped for her, as expected, around her 50th birthday.

“I got my diagnosis on a Thursday before a long Memorial Day weekend,” says Black. “I kept calling in, getting the switchboard and becoming increasingly anxious. But I was lucky. I had people I could call to talk me off the ledge.”

One of her impromptu counselors was Helen Eckmann.

Eckmann was initially diagnosed when she was 42, the first of three bouts with the disease. Following an inconclusive mammogram, Eckmann was instructed to come back in six months, but a sudden epiphany brought her back sooner.

“I was putting on a pair of shoes, and I think God spoke to me and said, ‘Go now!’” says Eckmann. “I told the doctor I wanted a needle biopsy to figure out whether it was actually cancer. They told me not to worry about it, to wait the full six months, but I insisted. At that point, the cancer had already moved into my lymph system.”

That was just the beginning of her long journey, including multiple rounds of chemotherapy and surgery. “About six years ago, I was going up the stairs, and my right femur broke,” says Eckmann. “The cancer had gone to my bones.”

Ruth Claire Black, Ed.D., J.D. and Helen Eckmann, Ed.D.

From experience to advocacy

Eckmann and Black were knocked down repeatedly by breast cancer, but they kept getting back up. During these treatment odysseys, each developed a profound ability to see the disconnects in the system: the oncologists who wouldn’t take their intuition seriously (but soon learned better); the insurance companies that seemed to make random coverage decisions; the difficulty finding timely, accurate information.

“I’m a lawyer, a professor and I’ve worked a lot as a consultant,” says Black. “But even with that background, I didn’t know what I needed to know to successfully move through treatment. I think that’s a common theme.”

Both wanted to find productive ways to give back. Eckmann was one of the earliest members of the Sanford Burnham Prebys’ NCI-designated Cancer Center’s Community Advisory Board, which includes cancer survivors and family members who’ve supported a loved one through treatment. She recalls her conversation, many years ago, with now-President Kristiina Vuori, M.D., Ph.D., who was the Cancer Center director at the time.

“I told her I wanted to help, and she leaned across the desk and practically hugged me,” said Eckmann. “She said she was going to put me to work, and she did.”

Helen Eckmann and Ruth Claire Black

Black joined a few years later. Together with fellow CAB members, they organize public events to educate the community about cancer research, teach scientists how to communicate their work to lay audiences and help principal investigators with their grant applications.

“Part of the Department of Defense’s (DOD’s) Breast Cancer Research Program grant assessment process is measuring community support for the research,” says Black. “We act as advocates, providing support letters and making sure the patient experience is understood in the lab.”

This is no small piece. Dedicated lab scientists spend much of their time conducting research. And while this often gives them great insights into cancer biology, and possible interventions, it can also create blind spots.

“One time I was at a lab meeting, and they were talking about an experiment that would require patients to give blood samples every month or so,” says Black. “But that's a high burden to place on people who may not have an extra two hours in their schedule. The lab’s focus was on how to collect these biomarkers sequentially over time, but they hadn’t really thought about the patients. This was a new perspective for them, and they were really open to it.”

Both Eckmann and Black have steadily elevated their game and are now part of the DOD’s Consumer Review Program, in which they rate grant proposals for their potential impact on patients. Eckmann has also joined NCI Cancer Center accreditation visits, and Black is on the Food & Drug Administration’s National Mammography Quality Assurance Advisory Committee.

All these efforts are driven by their concerns for fellow cancer patients and survivors. They clearly remember those early days, soon after diagnosis, when they didn’t understand their roles as patients, insisted on working and keeping their normal hectic schedules and tried to pretend that nothing was wrong.

Over time, they learned that cancer treatment is a marathon, and that it’s easy for people to waste tremendous energy on issues beyond their control until they have nothing left in the tank. However, they also want their peers to know that, yes, a cancer diagnosis is horrific, but it will help people find resilience they never knew they had.