arthritis Archives - Sanford Burnham Prebys
Institute News

Protein superfamily crucial to the immune system experiences Broadway-style revival

AuthorGreg Calhoun
Date

November 19, 2024

More than 25 years after targeting a member of this superfamily of proteins led to groundbreaking treatments for several autoimmune diseases including rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn’s disease, San Diego scientists note a resurgence of interest in research to find related new drug candidates.

In 1998, the same year “Footloose” debuted on Broadway, REMICADE® (infliximab) was approved by the FDA for the treatment of Crohn’s disease. This was the first monoclonal antibody ever used to treat a chronic condition, and it upended the treatment of Crohn’s disease.

Research published in February 2024 demonstrated better outcomes for patients receiving infliximab or similar drugs right after diagnosis rather than in a “step up” fashion after trying other more conservative treatments such as steroids.

Infliximab and ENBREL® (etanercept) — also approved in 1998 to treat rheumatoid arthritis — were the first FDA-approved tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF) inhibitors. TNF is part of a large family of signaling proteins known to play a key role in developing and coordinating the immune system.

The early success of infliximab and etanercept generated excitement among researchers and within the pharmaceutical industry at the possibility of targeting other members of this protein family. They were interested in finding new protein-based (biologics) drugs to alter inflammation that underlies the destructive processes in autoimmune diseases.

As “Footloose” made it back to Broadway in 2024 for the first time since its initial run, therapies targeting the TNF family are in the midst of their own revival. Carl Ware, PhD, a professor in the Immunity and Pathogenesis Program at Sanford Burnham Prebys, and collaborators at the La Jolla Institute for Immunology and biotechnology company Inhibrx, report in Nature Reviews Drug Discovery that there is a resurgence of interest and investment in these potential treatments.

“Many of these signaling proteins or their associated receptors are now under clinical investigation,” said Ware. “This includes testing the ability to target them to treat autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, as well as cancer.”

Today, there are seven FDA-approved biologics that target TNF family members to treat autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. There also are three biologics and two chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell-based therapies targeting TNF members for the treatment of cancer. This number is poised to grow as Ware and his colleagues report on the progress of research and many clinical trials to test new drugs in this field and repurpose currently approved drugs for additional diseases.

“The anticipation levels are high as we await the results of the clinical trials of these first-, second- and — in some cases — third-generation biologics,” said Ware.

Ware and his coauthors also weighed in on the challenges that exist as scientists and drug companies develop therapies targeting the TNF family of proteins, as well as opportunities presented by improvements in technology, computational analysis and clinical trial design.

Portrait of Carl Ware

Carl Ware, PhD, is a professor in the Immunity and Pathogenesis Program at Sanford Burnham Prebys.

“There are still many hurdles to get over before we truly realize the potential of these drugs,” noted Ware. “This includes the creation of more complex biologics that can engage several different proteins simultaneously, and the identification of patient subpopulations whose disease is more likely to depend on the respective proteins being targeted.

“It will be important for researchers to use computational analysis of genetics, biomarkers and phenotypic traits, as well as animal models that mimic these variables. This approach will likely lead to a better understanding of disease mechanisms for different subtypes of autoimmune conditions, inflammatory diseases, and cancer, enabling us to design better clinical trials where teams can identify the appropriate patients for each drug.”

Institute News

A strange research ecosystem: Discussing Lyme disease with Victoria Blaho

AuthorMiles Martin
Date

December 22, 2021

As an infectious disease immunologist studying Lyme disease, Victoria Blaho is one of a rare breed.

Sanford Burnham Prebys assistant professor Victoria Blaho, PhD, investigates the biochemical signals of the immune system and how they impact our bodies’ abilities to fight pathogenic infections, a branch of immunology that has become much less popular since the advent of antibiotics in the early 20th century.

Blaho’s disease of choice is Lyme disease, an unusual tick-borne bacterial infection that affects some 476,000 people in America each year, a number that is on the rise.

We caught up with Blaho to talk about why Lyme disease research is important, the progress being made and the work that remains in studying this strange and burdensome disease.

Why is Lyme disease research important?
Blaho: Lyme research is a very small field for a disease that is becoming bigger and bigger every year. Case counts are increasing for Lyme disease all over the world, and people get very sick from it. Some people are infected, take antibiotics and that’s the end of it. But others have chronic symptoms like arthritis or carditis that can last for years and become completely debilitating.

What makes Lyme difficult to study?
Blaho: One reason is that Lyme is an unusual infection from a microbiological standpoint. In the early days of Lyme research, there were studies showing that the bacteria that caused the disease, Borrelia burgdorferi, could change its physical form from a corkscrew shape to dormant blobs—and the blobs could be causing extended disease. This is a problem because scientists haven’t agreed on the true cause of chronic Lyme disease.

To make matters worse, a lot of the medical field still believes Lyme is easily curable with antibiotics, and if people are still having problems, then it’s psychosomatic. This makes it harder to get support for research into the longer-term inflammatory effects of Lyme. These politics make Lyme disease research a strange ecosystem of patients, physicians, researchers and funding agencies, and this is a barrier to learning more about the disease and helping people find relief.

How does your work enter the picture?
Blaho: I’ve been working on Lyme disease for over 15 years, since I was PhD student. It started because Celebrex was hugely popular at the time to treat arthritis, but nobody had ever studied it in the arthritis that emerges in Lyme disease. Celebrex inhibits an enzyme of the immune system that triggers inflammation, so we figured that Celebrex might work just as well in Lyme arthritis as in other types. But research on mice didn’t bear this out.
Inflammation doesn’t just peter out when an infections clears. The immune system has to clean up the mess. We discovered in mice that Celebrex inhibits the resolution of inflammation after Lyme disease has resolved, so the arthritis never went away.

Since then, my career has focused on exploring the signaling molecules that regulate inflammation and its resolution. These molecules affect all parts of the immune system and provide us with a whole host of different potential therapeutic targets for inflammatory diseases like chronic Lyme.

What are the next steps for your Lyme research and for the field at large? 
Blaho: My own immediate next step is to take the work I’ve been doing here at Sanford Burnham Prebys and connect it directly back to my original work with Lyme. My team here is currently working on a signaling molecule called S1P, and while we haven’t studied it in Lyme yet, we think there are connections between it and the immune mediators we first found through those Lyme studies.

Our next steps are to look for the protein that carries S1P in mice with Lyme disease. This protein is associated with disease susceptibility in other inflammatory illnesses like diabetes and cardiovascular disease, and we think it has a role to play in Lyme as well. We’re also planning to partner with the Bay Area Lyme Foundation to see if we can find changes in this protein in their collection of human samples.

More broadly, I think this field is hungry for innovation because there have been a small number of scientists focusing on it. If older ideas about Lyme being simple to treat were the complete picture, we’d already be able to better diagnose and treat patients. But we’re just not there yet.

Lyme may be a lot cleverer than we originally thought, but if we’re able to embrace new technologies and ideas and continue to push forward with new work, we’ll be able to find innovative approaches to fight Lyme and, ultimately, to help people suffering from this horrible disease.

Institute News

How misplaced DNA contributes to chronic illness

AuthorMiles Martin
Date

October 28, 2021

Though DNA is essential for life, it can also wreak havoc on our bodies as we age 

DNA is one of the essential building blocks of life, giving our cells instructions for virtually everything they do, but researchers at Sanford Burnham Prebys are investigating what happens to our cells when DNA ends up in places where it shouldn’t normally be, particularly as we age.

The answer – as described in their recent review in the journal Cell—is disease-causing inflammation. And the researchers hope that targeting this rogue DNA will lead to new therapeutic strategies for a range of age-related illnesses, including cancer, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, cardiovascular disease and neurodegenerative disorders.

“Age is the primary risk factor for all of these diseases, but they share another risk factor – chronic inflammation,” says first author Karl Miller, PhD, a postdoctoral researcher in the lab of Peter Adams, PhD, Sanford Burnham Prebys. “We’re trying to understand the underlying processes behind this inflammation so we can potentially treat all these age-related diseases together”

Typically, cells have DNA safely sequestered in their nucleus and in the mitochondria, where the DNA can do its job without interfering with the rest of the cells’ activities. When cells detect DNA in other areas, they unleash a series of biochemical responses designed to protect the cell from invaders. This response is a component of the innate immune system, our body’s first line of defense against infection.

Scientists have known about this system for decades, but until recently it was mostly thought to respond to foreign DNA, such as during a bacterial or viral infection. However, over the last decade, researchers have discovered that pieces of our own DNA, called endogenous cytoplasmic DNA, can escape from the nucleus or mitochondria and trigger this inflammatory response in our own cells, even in the absence of infection. The resulting ‘sterile’ inflammation can accumulate over time, contributing to a range of age-related diseases in all systems of the body.

But this inflammation is not without its upsides. Cytoplasmic DNA is actually an important short-term protective strategy against cancer formation. The inflammation can alert the immune system at the first sign of cancer, preventing its formation. But over the long term, the sterile inflammation caused by cytoplasmic DNA is also thought to contribute to cancer risk. In fact, we’ve only been able to observe the damage associated with sterile inflammation because people are now living long enough to experience it. 

“Systems like this exist because they’re beneficial in youth, but as we age, they break down,” says Miller. “100 years ago, a lot more people died from infectious diseases early in life. Over time, we’ve become better and better at treating these acute infections, and we’re living much longer. It’s in this later period in life that we see chronic diseases emerging that used to be much less common.”

Miller’s review describes four different types of cytoplasmic DNA fragments, classified according to when and how they appear. Some arise from the nucleus during mistakes in cell division. Others emerge because of errors in DNA repair or replication. Some even escape from mitochondria—energy-producing parts of the cell that have their own separate DNA. Others still are of unknown origin.

“They all look similar under a microscope, and they all can cause similar effects. That’s one of the major problems in this field. The benefit of studying how the different types emerge is that it gives us more points to target for therapeutics,” says Miller. 

In the Adams Lab, Miller and his colleagues look specifically at cytoplasmic chromatin fragments, one of the four types of cytoplasmic DNA. These fragments appear in the cell when the membrane surrounding the nucleus is weakened by senescence, a cellular stress response. Senescence is also associated with aging. 

“We’ve shown how this pathway works in mice, and now we’re actually moving forward with therapeutic applications for humans by doing drug screening to find compounds that can target it,” adds Miller. 

And while there is still a lot of work left for the researchers, their progress is encouraging. Adams, senior author on the Cell review, was recently awarded a $13 million grant by the NIH to study the effects of aging, including the role of cytoplasmic DNA, on the progression of liver cancer. 

“We like to call what we’re doing here ‘increasing the healthspan’, as opposed to the lifespan,” says Miller. “We’re hoping to maximize the healthy period of people’s lives.” 

Institute News

An evening with autoimmune disorder experts

AuthorMonica May
Date

June 26, 2019

On June 20, 2019, nearly 100 community members, including many people living with autoimmune disorders and their loved ones, joined us at our latest SBP Insights event. The discussion featured unique perspective from three experts—a scientist, a doctor and a patient—on a single topic: autoimmune disorders. 

More than 50 million Americans have an autoimmune disorder, such as Crohn’s disease, psoriasis or rheumatoid arthritis. These conditions are often painful, chronic and debilitating. For unknown reasons, more than 80 percent of these patients are women. 

Scientists know these disorders occur when the immune system mistakenly attacks healthy tissue. But researchers still don’t understand why immunosuppressive treatments don’t work for everyone or know the initial trigger that causes the immune system to misfire. Answers to these fundamental questions could unlock insights that lead to new, effective medicines. 

“Before I was diagnosed, I thought doctors had it all sorted out. Now I know there is so much they don’t know,” says 17-year-old Madison Koslowski, who was diagnosed last year with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. She uses a wheelchair and cane for mobility while she works with her doctor to find a treatment that relieves her intense joint pain. “Right now, my friends are planning their future and figuring out where they will go to college. But for me, there are so many unknowns. I don’t know if I’m going to respond to the next medicine we try or if I will be really sick. I feel like my life is on pause. I have no idea when it will start again.”

Madison traveled from Los Angeles with her mother and a friend to hear race-car driver Angela Durazo speak about her journey with rheumatoid arthritis and learn what’s on the horizon for autoimmune treatments (read Angela’s story).

Following Angela’s presentation, Carl Ware, PhD, professor and director of the Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases Center at Sanford Burnham Prebys, took the stage and provided an overview of the science behind autoimmune disease. Ware also described his ongoing research collaboration with Eli Lilly, which recently led to a new Phase 1 clinical trial for autoimmune disorders. 

Hal Hoffman, MD, chief, division of allergy, immunology and rheumatology at UCSD and Rady Children’s Hospital, wrapped up the discussion with an overview of how he and his team are turning to rare immune disorders to understand the conditions as a whole. A Q&A followed the brief presentations. 

17-year-old Madison Koslowski (right), who was diagnosed last year with juvenile idiopathic arthritis, poses with race-car driver Angela.

17-year-old Madison Koslowski (right), who was diagnosed last year with juvenile idiopathic arthritis, poses with race-car driver Angela.

The discussion was moderated by Zaher Nahle, PhD, CEO of the Arthritis National Research Foundation.

Join us at our next SBP Insights discussion, which focuses on pancreatic cancer and takes place on November 21, 2019. Event details.

Institute News

National Psoriasis Foundation Walk

Authormigartua
Date

July 31, 2015

Did you know that an estimated 125 million people are affected by psoriasis and there is currently no cure? On Sunday, October 11, 2015, the National Psoriasis Foundation is holding a walk in San Diego for a life free of psoriatic disease. The Foundation provides help to psoriasis patients and promotes research to find a cure. SBP is one of the grateful recipients of funding from the Foundation. Invite a few friends to come walk and support Team NPF as they walk to find a cure for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.

Continue reading “National Psoriasis Foundation Walk”