robotics Archives - Sanford Burnham Prebys
Institute News

Acceleration by automation

AuthorGreg Calhoun
Date

September 5, 2024

Increases in the scale and pace of research and drug discovery are being made possible by robotic automation of time-consuming tasks that must be repeated with exhaustive exactness.

Humans have long been fascinated by automata, objects that can or appear to move and act of their own volition. From the golems of Jewish folklore to Pinocchio and Frankenstein’s Creature—among the subjects of many other tales—storytellers have long explored the potential consequences of creating beings that range from obedient robots to sentient saboteurs.

While the power of our imagination preceded the available technology for such feats of automation, many scientists and engineers throughout history succeeded in creating automata that were as amusing as they were examples of technical mastery. Three doll automata made by inventor Pierre Jaquet-Droz traveled around the world to delight kings and emperors by writing, drawing and playing music, and they now fascinate visitors to the Musée d’Art et d’Histoire of Neuchâtel, Switzerland.

While these more whimsical machinations can be found in collections from the House on the Rock in Spring Green, Wis., to the Hermitage Museum in Saint Petersburg, Russia, applications in certain forms of labor have made it so more modern automation is located in factories and workshops. There is no comparing the level of automation at research institutions to that of many manufacturing facilities more than 110 years since the introduction of the assembly line, nor should there be given the differing aims. However, the mechanization of certain tasks in the scientific process has been critical to increasing the accessibility of the latest biomedical research techniques and making current drug discovery methods possible.

researcher at work in Prebys Center

As a premier drug discovery center, the Conrad Prebys Center for Chemical Genomics team is well-versed in using automation to enable the testing of hundreds of thousands of chemicals to find new potential medicines.

“Genomic sequencing has become a very important procedure for experiments in many labs,” says Ian Pass, PhD, director of High-Throughput Screening at the Conrad Prebys Center for Chemical Genomics (Prebys Center) at Sanford Burnham Prebys. “Looking back just 20-30 years, the first sequenced human genome required the building of a robust international infrastructure and more than 12 years of active research. Now, with how we’ve refined and automated the process, I could probably have my genome sampled and sequenced in an afternoon.”

While many tasks in academic research labs require hands-on manipulation of pipettes, petri dishes, chemical reagents and other tools of the trade, automation has been a major factor enabling omics and other methods that process and sequence hundreds or thousands of samples to capture incredible amounts of information in a single experiment. Many of these sophisticated experiments would be simply too labor-intensive and expensive to conduct by hand.

Where some of the automation of yore would play a tune, enact a puppet show or tell a vague fortune upon inserting a coin, scientists now prepare samples for instruments equipped with advanced robotics, precise fluid handling technologies, cameras and integrated data analysis capabilities. Automation in liquid handling has enabled one of the biggest steps forward as it allows tests to be miniaturized. This not only results in major cost savings, but also it allows experiments to have many replicas, generating very high-quality, reliable data. These characteristics in data are a critical underpinning for ensuring the integrity of the scientific community’s findings and maintaining the public’s trust.

Ian Pass headshot

Ian Pass, PhD, is the director of High-Throughput Screening at the Conrad Prebys Center for Chemical Genomics.

“At their simplest, many robotic platforms amount to one or more arms that have a grip that can be programmed to move objects around,” explains Pass. “If a task needs to be repeated just a few times, then it probably isn’t worth the effort to deploy a robot. But, once that step needs to be repeated thousands of times at precise intervals, and handled the exact same way each time, then miniaturization and automation are the answers.”

As a premier drug discovery center, the Prebys Center team is well-versed in using automation to enable the testing of hundreds of thousands of chemicals to find new potential medicines. The center installed its first robotics platform, affectionately called “big yellow,” in the late 2000s to enable what is known as ultra-high-throughput screening (uHTS). Between 2009 and 2014, this robot was the workhorse for completing over 100 uHTS of a large chemical library. It generated tens of millions of data points as part of an initiative funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) called the Molecular Libraries Program that involved more than 50 research institutions across the US. The output of the program was the identification of hundreds of chemical probes that have been used to accelerate drug discovery and launch the field of chemical biology.

“Without automation, we simply couldn’t have done this,” says Pass. “If we were doing it manually, one experiment at a time, we’d still be on the first screen.”

Over the past 10 years the Center has shifted focus from discovering chemical probes to discovering drugs. Fortunately, much of the process is the same, but the scale of the experiments is even bigger, with screens of over 750,000 chemicals. To screen such large libraries, highly miniaturized arrays are used in which 1536 tests are conducted in parallel. Experiments are miniaturized to such an extent that hand pipetting is not possible and acoustic dispensing (i.e. sound waves) are used to precisely move the tiny amounts of liquid in a touchless, tipless automated process. In this way, more than 250,000 tests can be accomplished in a single day, allowing chemicals that bind to the drug target to be efficiently identified. Once the Prebys Center team identifies compounds that bind, these prototype drugs are then improved by the medicinal chemistry team, ultimately generating drugs with properties suitable for advancing to phase I clinical trials in humans.

Within the last year, the Prebys Center has retired “big yellow” and replaced it with three acoustic dispensing enabled uHTS robotic systems using 1536 well high-density arrays that can run fully independently.

“We used to use big yellow for just uHTP library screening, but now, with the new line up of robots, we use them for everything in the lab we can,” notes Pass. “It has really changed how we use automation to support and accelerate our science. Having multiple systems allows us to run simultaneous experiments and avoid scheduling conflicts. It also allows us to stay operational if one of the systems requires maintenance.”

One of the many drug discovery projects at the Prebys Center focuses on the national epidemic of opioid addiction. In 2021, fentanyl and other synthetic opioids accounted for nearly 71,000 of 107,000 fatal drug overdoses in the U.S. By comparison, in 1999 drug-involved overdose deaths totaled less than 20,000 among all ages and genders.

Like other addictive substances, opioids are intimately related to the brain’s dopamine-based reward system. Dopamine is a neurotransmitter that serves critical roles in memory, movement, mood and attention. Michael Jackson, PhD, senior vice president of Drug Discovery and Development at the Prebys Center and co-principal investigator Lawrence Barak, MD, PhD, at Duke University, have been developing a completely new class of drugs that works by targeting a receptor on neurons called neurotensin 1 receptor or NTSR1, that regulates dopamine release.

The researchers received a $6.3 million award from NIH and the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) in 2023 to advance their addiction drug candidate, called SBI-810, to the clinic. SBI-810 is an improved version of SBI-533, which previously had been shown to modulate NTSR1 signaling and demonstrated robust efficacy in mouse models of addiction without adverse side effects.

Michael Jackson profile photo

Michael Jackson, PhD, is the senior vice president of Drug Discovery and Development at the Conrad Prebys Center for Chemical Genomics.

Prebys Center researchers at work

The funding from the NIH and NIDA will be used to complete preclinical studies and initiate a Phase 1 clinical trial to evaluate safety in humans.

“The novel mechanism of action and broad efficacy of SBI-810 in preclinical models hold the promise of a truly new, first-in-class treatment for patients affected by addictive behaviors,” says Jackson.


Programming in a Petri Dish, an 8-part series

How artificial intelligence, machine learning and emerging computational technologies are changing biomedical research and the future of health care

  • Part 1 – Using machines to personalize patient care. Artificial intelligence and other computational techniques are aiding scientists and physicians in their quest to prescribe or create treatments for individuals rather than populations.
  • Part 2 – Objective omics. Although the hypothesis is a core concept in science, unbiased omics methods may reduce attachments to incorrect hypotheses that can reduce impartiality and slow progress.
  • Part 3 – Coding clinic. Rapidly evolving computational tools may unlock vast archives of untapped clinical information—and help solve complex challenges confronting health care providers.
  • Part 4 – Scripting their own futures. At Sanford Burnham Prebys Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, students embrace computational methods to enhance their research careers.
  • Part 5 – Dodging AI and computational biology dangers. Sanford Burnham Prebys scientists say that understanding the potential pitfalls of using AI and other computational tools to guide biomedical research helps maximize benefits while minimizing concerns.
  • Part 6 – Mapping the human body to better treat disease. Scientists synthesize supersized sets of biological and clinical data to make discoveries and find promising treatments.
  • Part 7 – Simulating science or science fiction? By harnessing artificial intelligence and modern computing, scientists are simulating more complex biological, clinical and public health phenomena to accelerate discovery.
  • Part 8 – Acceleration by automation. Increases in the scale and pace of research and drug discovery are being made possible by robotic automation of time-consuming tasks that must be repeated with exhaustive exactness.
Institute News

Sanford Burnham Prebys hosts top life-science VC firm to learn the secrets of getting funded

AuthorMonica May
Date

February 26, 2019

There’s no way around it: Developing medicine is costly. The average drug takes about $2.6 billion to develop through FDA approval, according to the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development. With a price tag that high, securing venture capital (VC) funding is critical for turning a scientist’s discovery into reality.

This month, Kirsten Leute of Osage University Partners (OUP), a top life-science VC firm, spoke to SBP scientists about best practices and common pitfalls when making a VC pitch. 

Anjali Gupta, a graduate student in the laboratory of Karen Ocorr, PhD, assistant professor at SBP, attended the presentation and explained why the insights are so valuable. 

“Drug discovery is a complex and expensive process. It’s important to understand how bench science can be translated into successful products—in this case, potentially life-saving medicines,” says Gupta. “At SBP, scientists are investigating the underlying causes of rare, debilitating diseases and looking for cures for cancer, heart failure, Alzheimer’s disease and more by discovering novel therapeutic targets, signaling pathways, and mechanisms. By knowing the funding options and strategies available, we can make more informed decisions about our discoveries and increase the probability of developing our research into medicines for patients who need these treatments.” 

Below are seven tips Leute shared to help scientists navigate building a start-up and getting it funded. 

  1. It’s all about the team. VC firms look for an investable management team. Is this the leadership team’s first start-up? Or are they serial entrepreneurs? What skills do they have, and which do they lack? Being a novice entrepreneur isn’t a funding deal breaker—but you may want to consider supplementing your team with experienced partners. 
  2. Pick your partners wisely. The most important relationship decision you make in your life is choosing your significant other. The second most important? Finding your business partners. Many founders bring in colleagues who work down the hall—or even neighbors. But it’s most important to know how you work with one another. Can you argue respectfully? Do you trust that you all have the company’s best interest in mind? 
  3. Do your homework. Before you approach a VC firm, make sure you know its investment focus. Does it specialize in pre-clinical or late-stage assets? Does it lead investments or follow on? In recent years, we’ve seen more crossover investing: firms that invest in a company prior to an initial public offering (IPO). A firm’s focus may shift over time, so make sure to stay up to speed. 
  4. Contact the right person. At most firms, each individual has a specialty, such as immunotherapy. So, if you have an immunotherapy product, make sure you’re contacting the individual who works in that area—and not the person who focuses on robotics, for example. 
  5. Mind your budget. VC firms see a lot of pitches. They can spot it if you haven’t budgeted enough—or are budgeting too much—for an activity. If you’re a first-time entrepreneur, it’s best to hire a consultant or find a mentor who can help (see the resources below).
  6. Ask for advice. VC firms love giving advice, which can help strengthen your ultimate pitch for funding. This will also stimulate their interest in your company. Your institute’s technology transfer office may also have helpful resources and connections. 
  7. Show all your cards—even the negative ones. VC firms hate surprises. Make sure you address any concerns or risks up front. The truth always comes out eventually. 

Ready to get your discovery funded? Below are additional resources and reading materials. 

Resources: 

Reading: 

  • Life Sci VC: blog about all things biotech venture capital by scientist turned early-stage venture capitalist Bruce Booth 
  • The Long Run: veteran biotech reporter Luke Timmerman conducts in-depth interviews with biotech newsmakers 
  • Nature’s bioentrepreneur: practical advance and guidance for starting a biotech company 
Institute News

Florida Translational Research Program funding re-fuels drug discovery collaborations with leading research institutions

AuthorDeborah Robison
Date

January 18, 2017

Reinstatement of Florida Translational Research Program (FTRP) funding has provided scientists at Florida universities and medical research institutes with renewed access to the world-class drug discovery technology housed within Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute at Lake Nona (SBP). The FTRP offers investigators the chance to work with drug discovery experts to translate their research advances into potential new medicines. The facility’s high-tech resources, including high-throughput robotics that screen tens of thousands of chemical compounds per day, combined with expert advice from faculty that have decades of experience in the pharmaceutical industry, make for powerful collaborations that benefit the statewide life science industry.

Funded by the state of Florida and administered by SBP, the program’s most recent call for proposals netted 16 projects—some new and some ongoing—from all Florida universities with biomedical research programs, including the University of Florida, Florida State, Florida International University, University of Central Florida, University of South Florida and University of Miami, as well as the Mayo Clinic and Moffitt Cancer Center.  

All projects focus on major unmet medical needs: aggressive cancers, Alzheimer’s, diabetes, heart disease and drug-resistant infections. While some teams are testing drug libraries to find compounds with desired properties, others are refining active compounds for potency and specificity. The collaborations aim to identify drug candidates with clinical benefits such as reducing tumor size, halting aggressive breast cancer metastasis, reducing inflammation in diseased brains or treating antibiotic-resistant pathogens.

“Our intent is to replicate success stories like that of Pamela McLean, associate professor of neuroscience at the Mayo Clinic,” says Layton Smith, PhD, director of drug discovery at SBP’s Lake Nona campus. “The initial results from her FTRP project led to her receiving the biggest grant ever awarded by the Michael J. Fox Foundation. Similarly, our work with Kirk Conrad, professor of physiology at the University of Florida on a potential heart failure drug has attracted the interest of a major pharmaceutical company.”

“Our approach to collaborative drug discovery has brought more research funding to the state,” adds Smith. “But more important, our work may lead to new therapeutics that reduce the burden of disease around the world.”