cancer Archives - Page 2 of 11 - Sanford Burnham Prebys
Institute News

Mammalian Genome Engineering Group holds 2024 symposium in San Diego

AuthorGreg Calhoun
Date

September 25, 2024

The four-day event included talks from experts from across North America and opportunities to discuss improving experimental methods and approaches to analyzing the resulting data.

Researchers convened at Sanford Burnham Prebys in La Jolla from September 12-15 to hear presentations from their peers and confer about the latest developments in modifying the genomes of mammalian animal models to advance biomedical research.

Anindya Bagchi, PhD, associate professor in the Institute’s Cancer Genome and Epigenetics Program, planned the 4th Mammalian Genome Engineering Symposium, which included 26 presentations from experts across the United States and Canada. Attendees asked many questions throughout, and numerous speakers commented on how valuable the conversation at the meeting was for refining planned experiments and considering new ideas and approaches.

“It was a truly enjoyable and thought-provoking meeting,” said Angela Liou, MD, an instructor in the Cancer Genome and Epigenetics Program at Sanford Burnham Prebys and pediatric oncologist and hematologist at Rady Children’s Hospital-San Diego. “It also was incredibly helpful in informing the next steps of my research project.”

“I’m so grateful for the invitation to attend this symposium,” said Praveen Raju, MD, PhD, the Nathan Gordon Chair in Neuro-Oncology and medical director of the Pediatric Neuro-Oncology Program at Rady Children’s Hospital-San Diego and director of the Pediatric Neuro-Oncology Program at the University of California San Diego School of Medicine.

Anindya Bagchi, PhD, headshot

Anindya Bagchi, PhD, is an associate professor in the Cancer Genome and Epigenetics Program.

“The presenters and attendees were welcoming and collaborative, and I certainly learned a lot.”

The symposium brings together the Mammalian Genome Engineering Group, which was formed by a small group of genome engineering enthusiasts including Bagchi, Nada Jabado, MD, PhD, professor of Pediatrics and Human Genetics at McGill University and a hematologist and oncologist at Montreal Children’s Hospital; David Largaespada, PhD, a professor of Pediatrics, Genetics, Cell Biology and Development at the University of Minnesota Medical School and the associate director for Basic Research in the Masonic Cancer Center; and Michael Taylor, MD, PhD, The Cyvia and Melvyn Wolff Chair of Pediatric Neuro-Oncology at Texas Children’s Cancer and Hematology Center and professor of Pediatrics (Hematology-Oncology) at Baylor College of Medicine.

The group is interested in developing functional models of genomic and epigenetic mutations associated with human diseases—especially cancers—that are difficult to recreate in animal models. The group’s first symposium was coordinated by Taylor in Napa, Calif., in 2014, followed by the 2nd symposium that was organized by Jabado in Montreal in 2015. After a hiatus, the group was revived in 2023 with the 3rd symposium hosted again by Taylor in Houston.

“We believe this symposium will, in the coming years, become a leading forum for discussing cutting-edge genomic and epigenomic approaches to tackle challenging genetic and epigenetic mutations,” said Bagchi. “These approaches are likely to become standard practice in the near future.”

The Sanford Burnham Prebys scientists that presented at the 4th Mammalian Genome Engineering Symposium were:

  • Bagchi, “Why are MYC-driven cancers so lethal?” 
  • Liou, “Investigating the deposition of H3.3K27M oncohistone and its effect on retrotransposon reactivation in H3K27M pediatric diffuse midline glioma” 
  • Ani Deshpande, PhD, associate professor in the Cancer Genome and Epigenetics Program and associate director of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion in the NCI-Designated Cancer Center, “Functional genomic approaches to identify selective dependencies in synovial sarcoma” 
  • Peter D. Adams, PhD, the director of the Cancer Genome and Epigenetics Program, “The role of aging in cancer” 
  • Lukas Chavez, PhD, associate professor in the Cancer Genome and Epigenetics Program, “Circular extrachromosomal DNA promotes tumor heterogeneity and enhancer rewiring” 
  • Jerold Chun, MD, PhD, professor in the Degenerative Diseases Program, “Genetic mosaicism and somatic gene recombination in the brain” 
  • Adarsh Rajesh, graduate student, Sanford Burnham Prebys, “CCND1-CDK6 complex inhibits DNA damage repair and promotes inflammation in senescence and the aged liver”

Additional speakers included:

  • Taylor, “Why does medulloblastoma love to be tetraploid and other nonsense”
  • Jabado, “Co-opting 3D structures to fuel tumorigenesis”
  • Tannishtha Reya, PhD, Herbert and Florence Irving Professor of Basic Science Research in Physiology and Cellular Biophysics, Columbia University, “New genetically engineered models to understand cancer heterogeneity and therapy resistance in pancreatic cancer”
  • Simona Dalin, PhD, postdoctoral fellow, Broad Institute of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, “Contributions of perfect and imperfect homology to rearrangement formation in human and cancer genomes”
  • Alison M. Taylor, PhD, assistant professor of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University, “Functional and computational approaches to uncover the consequences of chromosome arm aneuploidy in cancer”
  • Sean Eagan, PhD, senior scientist in the Cell Biology program at The Hospital for Sick Children, professor of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, “An update on Genetic analysis of 16q-syntenic block deletion in the mouse mammary gland – a tumor suppressor arm”
  • Claudia Kleinman, PhD, associate professor of Human Genetics, McGill University, investigator at the Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, “Lineage programs and the 3D genome in pediatric brain tumors”
  • Branden Moriarity, PhD, associate professor of Pediatrics (Hematology and Oncology), University of Minnesota Medical School, “Next generation engineered immune effector cells for immunotherapy”
  • Beau Webber, PhD, associate professor of Pediatrics (Hematology and Oncology), University of Minnesota Medical School, “Building cancer in a dish: Sarcoma modeling using human pluripotent stem cells”
  • Sameer Agnihotri, PhD, associate professor of Neurological Surgery and director of the Brain Tumor Biology and Therapy Lab, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh, “Identifying genetic vulnerabilities by modeling Chromosome 9p loss”
  • Largaespada, “Loss of the polycomb repressor complex 2 (PRC2) alters the super-enhancer landscape, genome/epigenome stability, and therapeutic sensitivities of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors”
  • Teresa Davoli, PhD, assistant professor of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, New York University Langone Health, “Engineering chromosome specific aneuploidy by targeting human centromeres”
  • Rameen Beroukhim, MD, PhD, associate professor of Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, associate member of the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, “Detecting rearrangement signatures—naturally”
  • Quang Trinh, PhD, scientist, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, “Perspectives and Challenges in PFA Integrative Analysis”
  • Taylor Gatesman, graduate student, University of Pittsburgh, “Genome Engineering: DREaming of and vCREating new models”
  • Joseph Skeate, PhD, postdoctoral fellow, University of Minnesota Medical School, “Targeted CAR integration and multiplex base editing in a single-step manufacturing process for enhanced cancer immunotherapies”
Institute News

Using machines to personalize patient care

AuthorGreg Calhoun
Date

July 30, 2024

Artificial intelligence (AI) and other computational techniques are aiding scientists and physicians in their quest to create treatments for individuals rather than populations

The Human Genome Project captured the public’s imagination with its global quest to better understand the genetic blueprint stored on the DNA within our cells. The project succeeded in delivering the first-ever sequence of the human genome while foreshadowing a future for medicine once considered to be science fiction. The project presaged the possibility that health care could be personalized based on clues within a patient’s unique genetic code.

Chavez lab

The Chavez Lab

While many more people have undergone genetic testing through consumer genealogy and health services such as 23andMe and Ancestry than through health care systems, genomic sequencing has influenced clinical care in some specialties. Personalized medicine—also known as precision medicine or genomic medicine—has been especially helpful for people suffering from rare diseases that historically have been difficult to diagnose and treat.

Scientists at Sanford Burnham Prebys are employing new technologies and expertise to test ways to improve diagnoses and customize treatments for many diseases based on unique characteristics within tumors, blood samples and other biopsies.

AI and other computational techniques are enabling patient samples to be rapidly analyzed and compared to data from vast numbers of individuals who have been treated for the same condition. Physicians can use AI and other tools to identify subtypes of cancers and other conditions, as well as improve selection of eligible candidates for clinical trials.

“I think we’ve gotten a lot better at precision diagnostics,” says Lukas Chavez, PhD, an assistant professor in the Cancer Genome and Epigenetics Program at Sanford Burnham Prebys. “In my work at Rady Children’s Hospital in cancer, we can characterize a tumor based on mutations, including predicting how quickly different tumors will spread. What we too often lack, however, are better treatment approaches or medicines. That will be the next generation of precision medicine.”

Sanju Sinha, PhD, an assistant professor in the Cancer Molecular Therapeutics Program at Sanford Burnham Prebys, is developing projects to help bridge the gap between precision diagnostics and treatment. He is partnering with the National Cancer Institute on a first-of-its-kind computational tool to systematically predict patient response to cancer drugs at single-cell resolution.

A study published in the journal  Nature Cancer discussed how the tool, called PERCEPTION, was successfully validated by predicting the response to individual therapies and combination treatments in three independent published clinical trials for multiple myeloma, breast and lung cancer.

Lukas Chavez, PhD

Lukas Chavez, PhD, is an assistant professor in the Cancer Genome and Epigenetics Program at Sanford Burnham Prebys.

In each case, PERCEPTION correctly stratified patients into responder and non-responder categories. In lung cancer, it even captured the development of drug resistance as the disease progressed, a notable discovery with great potential.

Sanju Sinha, PhD

Sanju Sinha, PhD, is an assistant professor in the Cancer Molecular
Therapeutics Program at Sanford Burnham Prebys.

“The ability to monitor the emergence of resistance is the most exciting part for me,” says Sinha. “It has the potential to allow us to adapt to the evolution of cancer cells and even modify our treatment strategy.”

While PERCEPTION is not yet ready for clinics, Sinha hopes that widespread adoption of this technology will generate more data, which can be used to further develop and refine the technology for use by health care providers.

In another project, Sinha is focused on patients being treated for potential cancers that may never progress into dangerous conditions warranting treatment and its accompanying side effects.

“Many women who are diagnosed with precancerous changes in the breast seek early treatment,” says Sinha. “Most precancerous cells never lead to cancer, so it may be that as many as eight of 10 women with this diagnosis are being overtreated, which is a huge issue.”

To try and counter this phenomenon, Sinha is training AI models on images of biopsied samples in conjunction with multi-omics sequencing data. His team’s goal is to develop a tool capable of predicting which patients’ cancers would progress based on the imaged samples alone.

“In the field of precancer, insurance does not cover the cost of computing this omics data,” says Sinha. “Health care systems do routinely generate histopathological slides from patient biopsies, so we feel that a tool leveraging these images could be a scalable and accessible solution.”

If Sinha’s team is successful, an AI tool integrated into clinics would predict whether precancerous cells would progress within the next 10 years to guide treatment decisions and how patients are monitored.

“With precision medicine, our hope is not to just treat patients with better drugs, but also to make sure that patients are not unnecessarily treated and made to bear needless costs and side effects that disrupt their quality of life.”


Programming in a Petri Dish, an 8-part series

How artificial intelligence, machine learning and emerging computational technologies are changing biomedical research and the future of health care

  • Part 1 – Using machines to personalize patient care. Artificial intelligence and other computational techniques are aiding scientists and physicians in their quest to prescribe or create treatments for individuals rather than populations.
  • Part 2 – Objective omics. Although the hypothesis is a core concept in science, unbiased omics methods may reduce attachments to incorrect hypotheses that can reduce impartiality and slow progress.
  • Part 3 – Coding clinic. Rapidly evolving computational tools may unlock vast archives of untapped clinical information—and help solve complex challenges confronting health care providers.
  • Part 4 – Scripting their own futures. At Sanford Burnham Prebys Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, students embrace computational methods to enhance their research careers.
  • Part 5 – Dodging AI and computational biology dangers. Sanford Burnham Prebys scientists say that understanding the potential pitfalls of using AI and other computational tools to guide biomedical research helps maximize benefits while minimizing concerns.
  • Part 6 – Mapping the human body to better treat disease. Scientists synthesize supersized sets of biological and clinical data to make discoveries and find promising treatments.
  • Part 7 – Simulating science or science fiction? By harnessing artificial intelligence and modern computing, scientists are simulating more complex biological, clinical and public health phenomena to accelerate discovery.
  • Part 8 – Acceleration by automation. Increases in the scale and pace of research and drug discovery are being made possible by robotic automation of time-consuming tasks that must be repeated with exhaustive exactness.
Institute News

Pancreatic cancer symposium celebrates 10th anniversary in San Diego

AuthorGreg Calhoun
Date

May 22, 2024

The 2024 PancWest Symposium brought more than 120 scientists to the Sanford Burnham Prebys campus in San Diego to discuss the latest advances in pancreatic cancer research.

More than 120 pancreatic cancer researchers from the West Coast traveled to San Diego from as far as Vancouver to attend the 2024 PancWest Symposium on May 17. The PancWest Symposium was founded in 2014 to regularly bring the scientific community studying pancreatic cancer together to discuss advances in the field and foster new collaborations.

The PancWest Symposium is held every two years in a different city to showcase expert scientists who are making important contributions to the field of pancreatic cancer research, including tumorigenesis, tumor progression and the discovery of novel therapeutic paradigms, such as immunomodulation and metabolic targeting.

The 2024 event was held on the Sanford Burnham Prebys campus in the Fishman Auditorium and was hosted by Cosimo Commisso, Ph.D., director of, and associate professor in, the Institute’s Cancer Metabolism and Microenvironment Program; and Pamela Itkin-Ansari, Ph.D., adjunct professor in the Institute’s Development, Aging and Regeneration Program.

“While pancreatic cancer accounts for only three percent of cancer cases, it has the highest mortality rate among major cancers and is the third leading cause of cancer-related death in the U.S.,” says Commisso.

PancWest Symposium poster presentations in Chairmen's Hall

The symposium’s events included a keynote address, 12 featured speakers, a poster session and a series of “power talks” providing attendees a chance to hear two-minute oral presentations from selected poster presenters.

“Unless we find ways to better diagnose and treat this disease, it is projected to become the second most deadly cancer in less than 20 years,” adds Itkin-Ansari. “That is why events such as PancWest are so important to enhance innovation and foster collaboration.”

Rosalie C. Sears, Ph.D., professor of Molecular and Medical Genetics, co-director of the Brenden-Colson Center for Pancreatic Care and Krista L. Lake Chair in Cancer Research at Oregon Health & Science University in Portland, gave the symposium’s keynote address.

Additional events at the symposium included 12 featured speakers, a poster session and a series of “power talks” providing attendees a chance to hear two-minute oral presentations from selected poster presenters.

“Being a part of PancWest has been a transformative experience,” shares Itkin-Ansari. “The exchange of groundbreaking research and innovative ideas among leading experts advanced our scientific understanding.”

“It also paved the way for new therapeutic strategies, ultimately offering hope and improved outcomes for patients battling pancreatic cancer,” adds Commisso.

More information about the symposium and featured speakers is available on the event’s webpage.

Institute News

Seminar Series: extrachromosomal DNA and the metabolic circuits of cancer immune suppression

AuthorScott LaFee
Date

March 25, 2024

The ongoing Sanford Burnham Prebys seminar series will feature a pair of speakers on March 27, from noon to 1p.m., in the Fishman Auditorium. They will be presenting on two topics: extrachromosomal DNA and the tumor microenvironment.

First, Owen Chapman, PhD, a postdoctoral research scientist in the lab of Lukas Chavez, PhD, will discuss clinical and genomic features of circular extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) in medulloblastomas, a type of brain tumor.

EcDNA is DNA found off chromosomes, either inside or outside the nucleus of a cell. In a study published last year, Chavez (senior author), Chapman (first author) and colleagues reported that patients with medulloblastomas containing ecDNA are twice as likely to relapse after treatment and three times as likely to die within five years of diagnosis.

The second presentation will be by Kevin Tharp, PhD assistant professor in the Cancer Metabolism and Microenvironment Program. Tharp, who joined Sanford Burnham Prebys in December 2023, studies how tumors manipulate their mitochondria to improve survivability and how those cellular mechanics can be leveraged to create more effective therapies.

Institute News

New genome mapping tool may uncover secrets for treating blood cancers

AuthorGreg Calhoun
Date

February 1, 2024

The outlook for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), a deadly set of blood cancers that is difficult to treat, has remained dire for decades, especially among patients who are not eligible for bone marrow transplantation.

More than 30% of treated patients will never achieve complete remission using current chemotherapies and, even when chemotherapy treatments work, most patients relapse within five years without a transplant.

While prior research has begun to unravel the genetic underpinnings of the disease, more inquiry is needed to understand the genetic variation within the roughly 15 AML subtypes and how that variation might affect treatment strategies.

“In addition to the one to eight average genetic mutations in AML patients found in traditional sequencing studies, experiments employing high-resolution optical genomic mapping have found approximately 40 to 80 rare genomic structural variants per patient,” says Kristiina Vuori, MD, PhD, Pauline and Stanley Foster Distinguished Chair and professor in the Sanford Burnham Prebys Cancer Center’s Cancer Molecular Therapeutics Program. “We wanted to take these structural variant findings in AML to the next level by connecting them with patients’ sensitivity or resistance to current cancer treatments.”

Kristiina Vuori, MD, PhD

In a paper published January 18, 2024, in Cancers, a multidisciplinary team of biologists, bioinformaticians and clinicians from Sanford Burnham Prebys, Bionano Genomics Inc. and Scripps MD Anderson were the first to associate genomic structural variants (SVs) in AML patients with drug sensitivities.

“SVs are changes to the genome in which sections of 50 or more base pairs in a strand of DNA have been errantly deleted, duplicated, inverted or translocated,” explains Darren (Ben) Finlay, PhD, first author on the manuscript and research associate professor in the Sanford Burnham Prebys Cancer Center.

“Such changes amount to different combinations of DNA gains, losses or rearrangements. When cells use these altered instructions in the DNA to make proteins or carry out other functions, it is like a chef trying to cook with a recipe that is missing steps, has them in the wrong order or includes more or less of the key ingredients.”

Darren (Ben) Finally, PhD

Scientists have become more able to find SVs as next-generation genomic analysis technologies and techniques have improved. Research has shown that SVs contribute to the development and progression of cancer, including blood cancers. Of particular concern among SVs are DNA changes that join two otherwise distant genes. This event, called gene fusion, is known to drive certain pediatric and blood cancers.

Finlay, Vuori and colleagues analyzed SVs in samples from 23 AML patients and found their genomes featured 16-45 extremely rare SVs within genes but not seen in healthy volunteers’ samples. The scientists detailed the patients’ SVs using a technique called optical genome mapping. This tool tags DNA in specific locations to create recognizable sequences, unwinds and straightens the genomic DNA for linear scanning, and converts the imaged sequences into digital representations of DNA molecules. Because it directly images DNA rather than relying on algorithmic analyses, optical genome mapping is better than next-generation sequencing at finding SVs throughout the entire genome, especially large SVs, the researchers said.

To begin building the connection between SVs and drug sensitivity, the scientists tested samples from each patient with 120 FDA-approved drugs, and experimental treatments currently in phase III clinical trials. This allowed the researchers to map out how strongly each patient’s sample reacted with each drug.

Next, the investigators used statistical analysis to compare the SVs within the optical genome mapping results with the findings from the drug sensitivity tests. The team found 61 statistically significant interactions between SVs and existing cancer therapies. In one interaction, the group demonstrated that a commonly used AML drug, Idarubicin, and two similar compounds (Daunorubicin and Epirubicin) were more effective in leukemia samples with a specific insertion in a gene that carries the instructions for a signaling enzyme that helps nerves communicate with muscles. These and other examples lend support to the scientists’ hypothesis that optical genome mapping could be used to develop personalized treatment plans that account for patients’ SVs.

“In this pilot study, our hope was to identify structural variants that could be used as new biomarkers for current AML drugs as well as to identify other drugs that could be repurposed to treat leukemia patients,” says Finlay.

“Ensuring patients receive the most effective drugs on the market through personalized treatment and identifying new potential therapies for AML are critically important,” adds Vuori, senior author on the study. “Especially for patients who do not achieve remission with current standard chemotherapies or who are ineligible for bone marrow transplants or clinical trials.”
 

Cancers 2024, 16(2), 418; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16020418

Institute News

From postdoc to PI, it’s a journey. Don’t forget to pack some support

AuthorSanju Sinha
Date

December 15, 2023

The journal Nature Cancer asked a dozen early-career investigators to share their thoughts and experiences about starting their own labs in 2023. Among them: Sanju Sinha, PhD, who joined Sanford Burnham Prebys in June. Below is his essay. You can read the rest here.

Don’t forget to pack support 

Against the backdrop of a world emerging from a pandemic, starting my laboratory in 2023 was a whirlwind of excitement and anxiety, against the backdrop of a world emerging from a pandemic.

The goal for my laboratory is to understand cancer initiation and use this knowledge to develop preventative therapies—a goal appreciated by many, yet understudied and underfunded. We are aiming to achieve this by developing computational techniques based on machine-learning and leveraging big data from various sources, such as healthy tissues, pre-cancerous lesions and tumors. This journey has taken several unexpected turns, with its fair share of delights and challenges.

One significant hurdle appeared early: hiring. I recall the advice I received: “Forget it, you can’t hire a postdoc as an early-stage laboratory.” This made me ponder—if I were to choose right now, would I pursue a postdoc? My immediate answer was no. It struck me then: the traditional postdoc route needed a revamp.

Determined to instigate change, I introduced a new role: computational biologist. This position, an alternative to a postdoc, was tailored for transitioning to industry and offered better pay. The response was staggering—more than 400 applications.

Now, I’m proud to lead a fantastic team of three computational biologists from whom I am continually learning. This experience taught me a valuable lesson: crafting roles that serve both the goals of the laboratory and the career aspirations of the applicants can make a world of difference. I urge new principal investigators to shatter norms and design roles that provide fair compensation and smooth industry transition—reflecting the reality of the current job market.

However, the path to establishing a new laboratory was not without setbacks. Rejection is common in this field. I have already experienced a grant rejection and, considering the average grant success rate, I am prepared for many more.

Amid these challenges, my support system proved to be my lifeline. I’m grateful to be part of Sanford Burnham Prebys, which has proved to be more than just a top biomedical research institution. It is a community that provides unparalleled support for early principal investigators through generous startup packages, administrative assistance, hiring and grant-writing guidance, and a network of compassionate peers and mentors.

Equally important is my personal support system—my family, partner and friends who remind me that there is life beyond science, helping me maintain my well-being. This balance, I have realized, is the most crucial tool for anyone on a similar journey—so do not forget to pack support for the ride.

Institute News

The “Eph” system may pave the way for novel cancer therapies

AuthorSusan Gammon
Date

November 27, 2023

Over the past three decades, researchers have been investigating an important cell communication system called the “Eph system,” and the evidence implicating the system in cancer is staggering.

The Eph system is comprised of multiple Eph receptors and their ligands—ephrins—and are involved in contact-dependent communication between cells. They play essential roles in regulating various cellular processes.

Modern studies have shed light on the Eph system’s role in tumor expansion, invasiveness, metastasis, cancer stem cell maintenance and therapy resistance.

This month, Elena Pasquale, PhD, published a review in Nature Reviews Cancer that summarizes the current state of research on the Eph system and its links to cancer progression and drug resistance.

“The Eph system has many critical functions during the development of tissues and organs, but it also has the capacity to either promote or suppress cancer progression and malignancy” says Pasquale. “In cancer, the activities of the Eph system can differ depending on the circumstances—for example, which Eph receptors and ligands are present in a tumor cell, the types of tumor cells in which they function, and the characteristics of these cells.”

“It’s this remarkable versatility that makes the Eph system a compelling but also challenging target for potential therapies,” says Pasquale.

“The aims of this review were to comprehensively survey the large body of data regarding various aspects related to Eph signaling in tumors and to highlight potential strategies for therapeutic targeting,” says Pasquale. “Overall, while significant progress has been made in deciphering the Eph system in cancer, there is much more to learn.

“Gaining a deeper understanding of how the Eph system functions in cancer is challenging but will be essential for the development of targeted therapies and personalized treatment approaches for patients.”

Institute News

How cancer research silos perpetuate inequity in cancer outcomes: An interview with Svasti Haricharan

AuthorMiles Martin
Date

April 18, 2023

The National Institutes of Health recognizes National Minority Health Month each April. This is a time to raise awareness about the importance of reducing the health disparities faced by racial and ethnic minorities.

For our part, we spoke to Assistant Professor Svasti Haricharan, PhD, about her recently published review in Clinical Cancer Research. The paper describes some of the shortfalls of the current research focusing on cancer disparities. It also reveals what needs to happen to solve this problem. 

This paper describes “research silos” in cancer disparities, but what does this term mean?
The cancer research community has made a lot of progress recognizing that cancer research has a data diversity problem. We know that we need more researchers working on cancer disparities—for example, finding explanations as to why some racial and ethnic minorities have worse cancer survival rates than others. We also know that we need to generate more inclusive data in cancer research generally, which means building databases that include data from people of different backgrounds.

However, what we’re talking about in this new paper is a bit more subtle than that. It has more to do with which disparities researchers are studying and how they’re studying them. Cancer-disparities researchers tend to fall into two different categories with two very different approaches. One group focuses more on the societal problems driving disparities, and the other group is looking closely at the biology. But these two paths aren’t intersecting, which is preventing us from truly addressing racial disparities in cancer.

Can you tell us more about those two groups and how this division affects cancer research?
The first group includes researchers who study cancer disparities in the way most people understand them. They focus on social determinants of health, such as socioeconomic status and systemic bias in the healthcare system. The second group looks at the biology directly, focusing on how genetics impacts the molecular biology of cancer. These are both important research areas, and we’ve made a lot of progress independently with each of them.

The problem is that focusing on one or the other ignores something critical that has gained attention in recent years: lifestyle factors have a direct impact on the molecular biology of cancer. Our lived experiences leave a unique footprint in our cells on top of what’s already there because of what we inherited at birth. By keeping these two types of cancer research trapped in silos, we’re missing synergistic leaps that could truly transform our understanding of cancer outcome inequity. Breaking down these silos is the only way to keep moving this type of research forward.

How can we break down these silos? 
Looking at it broadly, funding bodies need to invest more in research that develops datasets using biological samples from underrepresented groups. This will help us learn more about how societal factors can have a different impact on the biology of cancer—depending on the person with the disease. Here in the lab, we need to create experimental systems that better represent the biology of people from racial and ethnic minorities. This could also help us solve an even bigger problem.

Therapeutic strategies for cancer that we find in the lab don’t often make it to the clinic. Improving the diversity of our cancer data will improve this success-to-failure ratio. It will help us identify treatments that work better in some people than in others and choose the best treatments for each patient. In other words, it will help us work toward truly individualized medicine. Ultimately, we can only develop good precision medicine for cancer when we start looking at all patient demographics more equitably.

Institute News

Padres Pedal the Cause 2023: Team Sanford Burnham Prebys raises $50,000 for cancer research

AuthorMiles Martin
Date

March 20, 2023

Team Sanford Burnham Prebys hit the pavement this weekend for Padres Pedal the Cause, an annual fundraising event that invites participants to cycle, spin, run or walk to support local cancer research. The funds raised through each year’s race go to seed grants that fund collaborative cancer research projects in San Diego.

“Padres Pedal the Cause is a chance for the cancer community to come together and remember why collaboration is so important in cancer research,” says bike rider Ze’ev Ronai, PhD, director of the Institute’s NCI-designated Cancer Center. “Virtually all of us know somebody who has been impacted by cancer, including me. This is my fifth Padres Pedal the Cause, and every year I’m so proud to be part of our Institute’s team and help contribute to cancer research outside the lab.”

This year’s team was formidable: 56 employees and friends of the Institute signed up to either ride, run, or walk in the event. Team members came from all areas of the Institute, including faculty, staff scientists, administrative staff, postdocs, and even current and former members of the Institute’s Board of Trustees, such as Bill Gerhart and Steve Williams. Other notable names on this year’s team included longtime participants such as Professor Nicholas Cosford, PhD and James Short, associate director of Digital Communications and Design. 

“I’ve been with Padres Pedal the Cause since the very beginning, and it’s one of the highlights of my year,” says Short, who has helped lead the Institute’s team for the last 10 years.

The team also included some new members this year, such as Assistant Professor Lukas Chavez, PhD, and Director of Experimental Pharmacology Raghu Ramachandra, PhD, who both joined the Institute late last year. 

While Institute employees were well represented on this year’s team, there were also current some of the team’s top fundraisers had a different reason to join team Sanford Burnham Prebys. Kim McKewon is a longtime donor to the Institute and has been participating in Padres Pedal the Cause since its inception in 2013. This year she raised more than $6,000; and to date, she has raised more than $30,000. 

“I pedal for my husband, Ray, who is in remission from leukemia because of science and research, the very focus of the grants that are given from the fundraising that comes out of this event,” she writes in her website bio.

It’s not too late to support Team Sanford Burnham Prebys
To date, team Sanford Burnham Prebys has raised more than $300,000 through Padres Pedal the Cause since its inception in 2013. And while this year’s ride is over, there is always time to support local cancer research. The fundraising deadline for this year’s Padre’s Pedal the Cause is April 18, and 100% of every dollar raised goes toward lifesaving cancer research. Help team Sanford Burnham Prebys create a world without cancer.

Support Team Sanford Burnham Prebys

 

 

Institute News

Sanford Burnham Prebys researchers awarded Curebound grants

AuthorMiles Martin
Date

March 20, 2023

Each year, Sanford Burnham Prebys joins Padres Pedal the Cause, an annual fundraising event that raises money for Curebound which awards collaborative cancer grants in the San Diego area.

These grants include Discovery Grants, which provide seed funds for high-risk/high-reward research in the earliest phases, and Targeted Grants, which are larger awards ($500K) that help translate promising discoveries into treatments for the clinic.

In the 2022-2023 Curebound Research portfolio, five researchers from Sanford Burnham Prebys were awarded grants: Associate Professor Anindya Bagchi, PhD, Professor Linda Bradley, PhD, Assistant Professor Lukas Chavez, PhD, Professor Nicholas Cosford, PhD, and Professor Michael Jackson, PhD

2022 Discovery Grant: Treating incurable pediatric brain tumors 
Bagchi and Chavez will collaborate to advance a new therapeutic approach for medulloblastoma, the most common childhood brain tumor. They will be focusing on a gene called MYC, found only in the deadliest forms of medulloblastoma. This form of brain cancer is currently untreatable, but Bagchi and Chavez recently discovered a molecule that can help control the activity of the MYC gene and potentially inhibit the growth of medulloblastoma tumors. The researcher holds promise to reveal a new treatment approach for this incurable cancer. 

The grant is titled “Decoding the Role of the Long Non-Coding RNA PVT1 in Medulloblastoma.”

2023 Targeted Grant: Discovering a new immunotherapy drug for melanoma
Bradley will be working with Soo Jin Park, MD, from UC San Diego Health to advance a new immunotherapy approach for malignant melanoma. Despite recent advances, this type of skin cancer still causes thousands of deaths in the U.S. each year. The goal of their project is to develop a new drug for melanoma that can reactivate the tumor-killing properties of the patient’s own immune system. This therapeutic approach has the potential to destroy tumors that are resistant to existing therapies, which could help save lives.

The grant is titled, “Advancing Immune Checkpoint Inhibition of PSGL-1 for Treatment of Malignant Melanoma.
 

2022 Discovery Grant: Developing drugs for bone-metastatic prostate cancer
Cosford will work with Christina Jamieson, PhD, from the University of California, San Diego, to advance a new treatment approach for prostate cancer that has spread to the bones. Bone is the most common place for prostate cancer to metastasize, and this form of cancer is currently incurable. The researchers will look for drugs that can kill tumor cells by inhibiting autophagy, a process that promotes tumor progression. The results of the study could identify a new drug ready for clinical trials.

The grant is titled “Pre-Clinical Development of New Autophagy Targeting Drugs for Bone Metastatic Prostate Cancer.”

2022 Discovery Grant: Repurposing drugs for deadly childhood brain cancer
Jackson and Chavez will collaborate to identify new treatment options for ependymoma, an aggressive pediatric brain tumor and leading cause of death among childhood cancer patients. The researchers will screen patient tumor cells against drugs already approved by the FDA for other conditions, looking for drugs that could be repurposed to fight these tumors. Because FDA-approved drugs are known to be safe for humans, this may prove to be the quickest way to help patients currently living with this cancer. 

The grant is titled “High Throughput-Screen for Inhibitors of Pediatric Ependymoma.”